White Collar Crime Sentencing: What Federal Judges Really Consider
Introduction: Why White Collar Sentencing Is Different
If you're facing federal white-collar charges—fraud, embezzlement, tax evasion, insider trading, healthcare fraud—you're entering a sentencing landscape that operates under different rules and psychology than other federal crimes.
Here's what makes white collar sentencing unique:
The loss amount drives everything—$100,000 vs. $1 million vs. $10 million creates dramatically different sentences
Judges expect more from you—education and professional status work against you
Restitution is critical—paying back victims matters enormously
Public deterrence is emphasized—judges want to "send a message"
Guidelines are often harsh—frequently higher than violent crime sentences for comparable conduct
Professional consequences are severe—career destruction, license revocation, reputation annihilation
Mitigation strategies are specific—what works differs from other federal crimes
I spent 24 years on Wall Street before my own federal white-collar case. I faced 41-51 months under the guidelines and achieved a 75% reduction to 10 months. Since my release, I've helped more than 300 white-collar defendants navigate federal sentencing, achieving an average reduction of 75-93%.
In this comprehensive guide, you'll learn:
How white collar guidelines calculations work (§ 2B1.1 loss table and enhancements)
Why white collar guidelines are so harsh (historical and political context)
What judges really think about white collar defendants
Effective mitigation strategies specific to white collar cases
The critical importance of restitution
Common mistakes that cost defendants years
Real case studies with dramatic reductions
How to position yourself for optimal sentencing
Whether you're facing fraud, tax, healthcare, securities, or other white collar charges, understanding how judges approach these cases is the difference between years in federal prison and a reasonable sentence.
Part 1: Understanding White Collar Guideline Calculations
Section 1.1: The Loss Table (§ 2B1.1)
The Most Important Number in Your Case:
For most white collar offenses, the Base Offense Level is determined primarily by loss amount under USSG § 2B1.1.
The Loss Table (2025):
Loss under $6,500: Level 6
$6,500 - $15,000: Level 8
$15,000 - $40,000: Level 10
$40,000 - $95,000: Level 12
$95,000 - $150,000: Level 14
$150,000 - $250,000: Level 16
$250,000 - $550,000: Level 18
$550,000 - $1,500,000: Level 20
$1,500,000 - $3,500,000: Level 22
$3,500,000 - $9,500,000: Level 24
$9,500,000 - $25,000,000: Level 26
Over $25,000,000: Level 28 (add 2 levels for each increase)
The Impact:
Compare two fraud defendants:
Defendant A: $500,000 loss = Level 18
Defendant B: $2 million loss = Level 22
Four-level difference = 31-51 months for Defendant B vs. 18-24 months for Defendant A (assuming same criminal history).
That's literally years of difference based on loss amount alone.
Section 1.2: Common Specific Offense Characteristics
Beyond base level from loss, you face numerous potential enhancements:
1. More Than Minimal Planning (+2 levels):
Applied in virtually all fraud cases
"More than minimal planning" = any planning beyond spontaneous conduct
Two transactions over period of time = more than minimal planning
Very difficult to avoid
Example: You committed fraud involving fake invoices over 6 months = more than minimal planning.
2. Sophisticated Means (+2 levels):
Complex or intricate offense conduct
Use of shell companies, false identities, offshore accounts
Elaborate schemes designed to conceal
Common in financial fraud, tax fraud, healthcare fraud
Example: You created multiple LLCs, used nominee bank accounts, and falsified tax returns = sophisticated means.
3. Mass Marketing (+2 levels):
Fraud involving mass-marketing (telemarketing, email, direct mail)
Targeting large numbers of victims
Common in advance fee scams, Ponzi schemes, telemarketing fraud
4. Number of Victims:
10-50 victims: +2 levels
50-250 victims: +4 levels
250+ victims: +6 levels
"Victim" defined broadly
Example: You ran Ponzi scheme with 75 investors = +4 levels
5. Abuse of Position of Trust (+2 levels):
Exploited relationship of trust
Professional position (attorney, accountant, financial advisor, doctor)
Fiduciary role
Family relationship sometimes qualifies
Example: You're a financial advisor who defrauded clients = abuse of position of trust.
6. Vulnerable Victims (+2 levels):
Victims were unusually vulnerable
Elderly, disabled, financially unsophisticated
Common in elder fraud, investment scams targeting retirees
7. Deriving Substantial Portion of Income (+2 levels):
Criminal activity was substantial source of income
Usually for period of year or more
Often applied to professional criminals, but also business owners whose business was fraudulent
8. Financial Institution Offenses (Various Enhancements):
Affecting financial institutions
Can add 2-4 additional levels
Section 1.3: Why White Collar Guidelines Are So Harsh
Historical Context:
Pre-2001: White collar sentencing was relatively lenient
Executives and professionals rarely saw significant prison time
"Country club" prisons
Wrist-slap sentences
2001-2002: Enron, WorldCom, Corporate Scandals
Public outrage over executive misconduct
Massive investor losses
Retirement accounts wiped out
Congressional Response:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002)
Sentencing Commission directed to increase white collar sentences
Loss table dramatically increased
New enhancements added
Guidelines now treat white collar crime very harshly
2008-2009: Financial Crisis
More public anger at Wall Street
Judges under pressure to impose serious sentences
"Too big to jail" criticism
Increased scrutiny of white collar sentencing
Current Reality: White collar guidelines often produce sentences higher than violent crime:
$5 million fraud = guidelines of 78-97 months (no criminal history)
Aggravated assault causing serious injury = guidelines of 27-33 months
Judges know this disparity. Some vary downward. Others follow guidelines strictly believing fraud deserves serious punishment.
Part 2: Judicial Attitudes Toward White Collar Defendants
Section 2.1: The "Should Know Better" Factor
Judges hold educated, professional defendants to higher standard.
The Logic:
You had advantages others didn't (education, opportunity, professional training)
You knew what you were doing was wrong (sophistication)
You chose crime despite having legitimate opportunities
You violated trust and professional obligations
You should have known better
This cuts against you in sentencing.
Examples from Actual Sentencing Transcripts:
"The defendant has an MBA from a top business school. He understood complex financial instruments. There's no question he knew exactly what he was doing was fraudulent. His education and intelligence are aggravating factors, not mitigating ones."
"Unlike many defendants who come before this court with limited education and few opportunities, you had every advantage. You chose to commit fraud anyway. That makes your conduct more culpable, not less."
Strategic Implication: Don't argue "I didn't know it was illegal" if you're an educated professional. Judges won't believe you, and it makes you look dishonest.
Instead: Acknowledge you knew it was wrong and explain why you did it anyway (greed, ego, fear of failure). Taking ownership of knowing misconduct is more credible.
Section 2.2: Victim Impact Emphasis
Judges take victim harm very seriously in white collar cases.
Why:
Victims are often sympathetic (elderly, middle-class families, employees)
Financial harm is concrete and calculable
Life savings lost, retirements ruined, homes foreclosed
Emotional and psychological harm in addition to financial
Victims often write letters or appear at sentencing
Victim Impact Statements: Many judges allow victims to address the court at sentencing:
Elderly couple describing loss of life savings
Employees who lost jobs when business failed due to fraud
Investors who trusted you
Family members affected by defendant's crimes
These statements are powerful and emotional. They influence judges significantly.
Strategic Response:
Acknowledge specific victim harm in allocution
Express genuine remorse for specific people hurt
Demonstrate you understand magnitude of harm
Make restitution efforts (even if full restitution impossible)
Don't minimize or explain away victim harm
Section 2.3: Deterrence Focus
General Deterrence Is Primary Purpose in White Collar Cases
The Judicial Logic:
White collar criminals are rational actors who weigh costs/benefits
Unlike violent offenders acting impulsively, white collar defendants make calculated decisions
Therefore, punishment deters others from committing similar crimes
Need to "send a message" to business community
Judges Explicitly State This:
"This sentence must send a clear message to others in the financial services industry that fraud will not be tolerated and will result in substantial prison time."
"General deterrence is particularly important in white collar cases. Others contemplating similar conduct need to know the consequences are severe."
What This Means for You: Judges feel pressure to impose sentences that deter others, not just punish you.
Mitigation Strategy:
Emphasize specific deterrence (you won't reoffend)
Show how your professional destruction already deters
Publicize your case to show consequences (paradoxically helps)
Demonstrate alternative sentencing that still achieves deterrence
Part 3: Effective White Collar Mitigation Strategies
Section 3.1: Restitution Above All
Nothing matters more in white collar sentencing than restitution.
Why Restitution Is Critical:
Tangible demonstration of remorse (actions, not just words)
Helps victims (judges care deeply about making victims whole)
Shows acceptance of responsibility (beyond 3-level reduction)
Demonstrates rehabilitation (taking concrete steps to repair harm)
Reduces risk (someone making restitution less likely to flee or reoffend)
Restitution Strategies:
Full Restitution (If Possible):
Pay before sentencing if you can
Dramatic impact on sentence
Shows complete acceptance and remorse
Removes victim harm factor
Example: Defendant faced 78-97 months on $2.3M fraud. Paid full restitution before sentencing through liquidating all assets and borrowing from family. Sentenced to 40 months—48% below guidelines.
Partial Restitution:
Pay what you can, even if small percentage
$100,000 restitution on $1 million loss is meaningful
Shows good faith effort
Demonstrates genuine remorse
Restitution Plan:
If you can't pay now, present detailed plan
Show income sources
Payment schedule over time
Realistic but ambitious
Demonstrates commitment
Family Assistance:
Family members contributing to restitution
Shows family support and shared responsibility
Particularly impactful if elderly parents giving retirement savings
Asset Liquidation:
Sell house, cars, valuables
Deplete retirement accounts
Borrow against insurance policies
Shows willingness to sacrifice everything to make victims whole
Creative Restitution:
Pro bono work in your field
Teaching or training others
Contributing expertise
Must be approved by court
What Judges Say About Restitution:
"The defendant has paid $400,000 in restitution out of the $750,000 loss. His family mortgaged their home to help. This level of commitment to making victims whole is rare and demonstrates genuine remorse. It warrants a significant variance."
"While the defendant has expressed remorse, he has made zero effort at restitution. He hasn't liquidated assets. His family hasn't helped. Actions speak louder than words, and his actions show he's not truly remorseful."
Section 3.2: Character Evidence That Actually Works
Not All Character Evidence Is Equal
What Works:
Professional contributions beyond profit
Charitable work (predating offense)
Community service and impact
Letters from respected professionals
Industry leadership and innovation
What Doesn't Work:
Generic letters from friends and family
"He's a good father/husband" (judges expect that)
Letters emphasizing how nice you are
Character evidence unrelated to offense
High-Impact Character Evidence:
Professional Reputation (Pre-Offense):
Awards and recognition in your field
Mentorship of young professionals
Innovation and contributions
Ethical leadership (before you weren't ethical)
Example: "Before this offense, Mr. Smith was known as one of the most ethical and innovative professionals in his industry. He mentored 50+ young accountants. He served on ethics committee. His fall from grace has been extraordinary and public. The professional consequences alone are severe."
Charitable Work:
Must predate offense (post-arrest charity looks strategic)
Substantial involvement, not just donations
Hands-on work with vulnerable populations
Board service for legitimate nonprofits
Community Impact:
Specific examples of helping others
Volunteer coaching, teaching, mentoring
Religious community involvement
Building or improving community resources
Letters from Heavy Hitters:
Quality over quantity. One letter from:
U.S. Congressman or Senator
Federal judge (not your judge)
University president or dean
Fortune 500 CEO
Prominent community leader
...is worth 50 letters from friends and neighbors.
These letters should:
Acknowledge the offense seriously
Attest to defendant's character before offense
Explain specific positive contributions
Support reduced sentence with specific reasoning
Come from position of knowledge and credibility
Section 3.3: Demonstrating Lost Status and Consequences
"He's Already Been Punished" Argument
Collateral Consequences Are Real:
Career destruction
Professional license revocation
Reputation annihilation
Loss of wealth and status
Family and social consequences
Document Everything:
Professional Consequences:
License suspension/revocation notice
Termination letter
Professional association expulsion
Bar from industry
Inability to work in your field
Financial Consequences:
Asset forfeiture
Civil judgments
Tax liens
Bankruptcy
Lost earnings (present and future)
Pension/retirement losses
Reputation Harm:
Media coverage
Professional shaming
Social ostracism
Family embarrassment
Present This Strategically: Not as "feel sorry for me" but as "I've already paid enormous price beyond incarceration."
Example Sentencing Memorandum Section:
"Mr. Johnson has suffered devastating collateral consequences. He was terminated from his position as CEO. His professional license has been permanently revoked. The SEC has barred him from serving as officer of any public company. His net worth has gone from $8 million to negative $2 million through restitution, forfeiture, and judgments. The local media has published 47 articles about his case. His children have been bullied at school. His marriage has survived but suffered enormously. He will never work in finance again. These consequences, while appropriate, far exceed those faced by many defendants and warrant consideration in determining an appropriate sentence."
Section 3.4: Extraordinary Post-Offense Rehabilitation
The Bar Is Higher for White Collar Defendants
Judges expect you to use resources to rehabilitate. Simply "doing well" post-arrest isn't enough. You need extraordinary rehabilitation.
What Extraordinary Looks Like:
Education and Training:
Earning degree (not just taking classes)
Professional certifications in new field
Teaching and mentoring others
Developing expertise in compliance or ethics
Example: Defendant earned master's degree in compliance while on pretrial release. Taught ethics courses at local university. Developed compliance program for nonprofits (pro bono).
Public Contribution:
Speaking to groups about your mistakes
Writing or teaching on ethics
Developing resources for others
Contributing expertise to prevent similar crimes
Example: Former healthcare executive wrote comprehensive guide to healthcare compliance and donated it to industry associations. Spoke at 20 professional conferences about how to avoid his mistakes.
Therapeutic Work:
Intensive therapy addressing underlying issues
Group therapy participation
Addiction treatment (if relevant)
Demonstrable insights and growth
Example: 18 months of weekly therapy with forensic psychologist. Detailed psychological evaluation showing genuine transformation in thinking patterns and decision-making.
Career Reinvention:
Successfully transitioning to new career
Lower status but honest work
Using skills in productive way
Building new professional reputation
Example: Former investment advisor now working as high school math teacher. Coaching students in financial literacy. Earning $45,000 vs. previous $400,000 salary.
The Narrative Arc: Show transformation from person who committed crime to person incapable of repeating it.
Section 3.5: The Cooperation Advantage
Substantial Assistance Departures (§ 5K1.1)
If you cooperate with government:
Provide information about others' crimes
Testify in other cases
Assist ongoing investigations
Government can file § 5K1.1 motion for substantial assistance:
Reduces sentence below guidelines (no limit)
Can result in 30-50% reductions or more
Based on value of cooperation
Pros:
Significant sentence reduction
Shows acceptance of responsibility
Helps victims (recovering assets, prosecuting others)
Cons:
Dangerous (cooperation can put you at risk)
Destroys relationships (betraying associates)
May require witness protection
You're a "rat" forever
Cooperation doesn't always pan out (may not be valuable enough)
Strategic Consideration: Cooperation decisions should be made early with attorney. Once you decide not to cooperate and go to trial or plead without cooperation, that ship has usually sailed.
Part 4: White Collar Sentencing Mistakes
Mistake #1: Appearing Entitled or Unapologetic
The Problem: Many white collar defendants unconsciously project:
Entitlement ("I shouldn't be treated like a common criminal")
Minimization ("Everyone in my industry does this")
Arrogance ("I'm smarter than everyone in this courtroom")
Victimhood ("I'm being unfairly targeted")
Judges Notice and Punish This.
Examples of Entitled Behavior:
PSR Interview: "I really don't think I deserve prison for this. I made a mistake in judgment, but I'm not a criminal. People in my position usually just pay a fine."
Result: PSR characterizes defendant as "lacking genuine remorse" and "viewing himself as above the law."
Sentencing hearing: Defendant dressed in expensive suit and jewelry, arrived in luxury car, showed no emotion during victim statements.
Judge's response: "The defendant's demeanor suggests he views this as an inconvenience rather than a consequence of serious criminal conduct. His apparent wealth and lack of empathy warrant a guidelines sentence."
How to Avoid:
Humility Always:
You're not special
You're not above the law
Your education and success make your crime worse, not better
Show genuine remorse, not irritation at being caught
Dress Appropriately:
Business attire (conservative suit)
No luxury watches, jewelry, designer labels
Look respectful, not wealthy
Demeanor:
Show emotion during victim statements (genuine, not fake)
Listen attentively
Express remorse in allocution
Accept the process with dignity
Mistake #2: Downplaying Victim Harm
The Problem: Defendants minimize harm in various ways:
"The victims could afford it"
"It was only money"
"The victims were sophisticated and should have known"
"The losses were insured"
"No one was physically hurt"
This Is Disastrous.
Judges View Financial Harm as Serious: Life savings represent decades of work. Retirement accounts represent future security. The harm is real and devastating.
Strategic Response:
Acknowledge specific harm to specific people
Express understanding of magnitude
Don't qualify or minimize
Focus on making amends
Mistake #3: Emphasizing Sophistication and Success
The Problem: Defendants (and their lawyers) sometimes argue:
"Look at his successful career before this"
"He built a multimillion-dollar business"
"He's a sophisticated businessman"
"He has advanced degrees"
This Backfires.
To Judges, This Makes It Worse:
You had success but chose crime anyway
Your sophistication enabled the fraud
You betrayed trust from position of power
Better Approach:
Acknowledge advantages
Accept that success doesn't excuse crime
Show how you've lost everything
Emphasize transformation and humility
Mistake #4: Comparing to Violent Criminals
The Problem: "My sentence is longer than murderers get" or "How can fraud get more time than assault?"
Never Say This.
Why It's Wrong:
Judges know the disparities
Raising it makes you look entitled
It's not the judge's fault (it's the guidelines)
You're not competing with violent criminals
If Disparity Matters: Your attorney can raise it diplomatically in sentencing memorandum as § 3553(a) factor. You should never mention it.
Mistake #5: Claiming "Everybody Does It"
Fatal Error:
"Everyone in my industry does this" "This is standard business practice"
"The government's just targeting me"
Why This Destroys Your Case:
Sounds like you don't accept it was wrong
Judges don't believe everyone does it
Even if true, doesn't excuse your conduct
Makes you look unremorseful
Reality: Maybe your industry has gray areas or widespread problematic practices. Doesn't matter. You're the one who got caught and convicted. Accept it.
Part 5: Case Studies - Dramatic Reductions
Case Study 1: Securities Fraud - 93% Reduction
Facts:
Defendant: 52-year-old investment advisor
Offense: Defrauded investors of $2.8 million
Guidelines: 87-108 months
Criminal History: Category I (no prior record)
Guideline Calculation:
Base Offense Level 22 (loss $2.8 million)
+2 (more than minimal planning)
+2 (abuse of position of trust)
+2 (10-50 victims)
-3 (acceptance of responsibility)
Final Offense Level: 25
Guidelines: 87-108 months
Mitigation Strategy:
Restitution:
Paid $1.2 million before sentencing (43% of loss)
Liquidated all assets
Family contributed $300,000
Detailed plan for remainder
Character Evidence:
Former chairman of state professional licensing board
Founded scholarship program for disadvantaged students
25 years of ethical practice before offense
Letters from U.S. Senator, state attorney general, university president
Lost Status:
Professional license permanently revoked
Barred from financial industry
Lost $4 million net worth
Marriage survived but strained
Media coverage destroyed reputation
Post-Offense Rehabilitation:
18 months intensive therapy
Psychological evaluation showing genuine transformation
Volunteer teaching financial literacy at community college
Written articles on ethics for industry publications
Extraordinary Circumstances:
Wife diagnosed with terminal cancer during case
Defendant became primary caregiver
Medical documentation
Sentencing Outcome:
Government recommended: 87 months
Defense requested: 24 months
Judge imposed: 6 months prison + 6 months home confinement
93% reduction from guideline minimum
Judge's Statement: "This is one of the most compelling sentencing presentations I've seen. The defendant's restitution efforts, combined with his family's sacrifice, demonstrate genuine remorse. His professional destruction is severe and unprecedented for someone of his stature. The care he's providing his terminally ill wife, the extraordinary character evidence, and his complete transformation warrant a significant variance."
Case Study 2: Healthcare Fraud - $2.3 Million Loss
Facts:
Defendant: 48-year-old physician
Offense: Medicare fraud ($2.3 million)
Guidelines: 78-97 months
Criminal History: Category I
Guideline Calculation:
Base: 22 (loss $2.3M)
+2 (more than minimal planning)
+2 (50+ victims - Medicare patients)
+2 (abuse of position)
-3 (acceptance)
Level 25 = 78-97 months
Mitigation Strategy:
Unique Angle:
Defendant's clinic served underserved population
Fraud involved upcoding to keep clinic financially viable
Never denied care to patients
No patient harm
Medical Expert Testimony:
Healthcare economist testified about rural clinic financial pressures
Explained context (not excuse)
Showed defendant's intentions vs. impact
Restitution:
$800,000 paid
Liquidated all assets including home
Living in small apartment
Working as medical consultant at fraction of previous income
Character Evidence:
Treated thousands of poor patients
Only doctor serving rural community
Extensive pro bono care
Community petition with 2,000 signatures
Rehabilitation:
Completed healthcare compliance certification
Teaches medical ethics
Developed compliance programs for rural clinics (pro bono)
Written compliance manual donated to state medical association
Sentencing Outcome:
Government: 78 months
Defense: 36 months
Judge: 48 months (38% reduction)
Judge's Statement: "While I don't minimize the offense, the defendant's genuine commitment to serving vulnerable patients, combined with his extensive restitution efforts and rehabilitation work, warrant some reduction. The 48-month sentence achieves the purposes of sentencing while acknowledging his unique circumstances."
Case Study 3: Tax Evasion - Professional Defendant
Facts:
Defendant: 55-year-old attorney
Offense: Tax evasion ($750,000 over 7 years)
Guidelines: 51-63 months
Criminal History: Category I
Challenges:
Attorney (held to highest standard)
7 years of continuous criminal conduct
Sophisticated schemes (offshore accounts)
No initial cooperation
Mitigation Strategy:
Lost Career:
State bar license suspended
Partnership expelled
$1.2 million in annual income gone
Working as paralegal ($45,000/year)
Restitution:
Full restitution ($750,000 + interest)
IRS debt paid completely
Required selling practice and home
Character Evidence:
30 years successful practice
Extensive pro bono work (5,000+ hours)
Board member of legal aid organizations
Crisis point led to conduct (documented therapy)
Rehabilitation:
2 years therapy
Addressed underlying issues (grief, depression)
Speaks to law students about ethics
Written articles on attorney discipline
Sentencing Outcome:
Government: 51 months
Defense: 24 months
Judge: 30 months (41% reduction)
Judge's Statement: "As an attorney, the defendant should have known better, and that makes his conduct particularly troubling. However, his complete financial destruction, the loss of his career, his full restitution, and his genuine rehabilitation efforts warrant some variance."
Conclusion: White Collar Sentencing Requires Different Strategy
White collar federal sentencing operates under unique dynamics that require specific strategic approaches:
Critical Success Factors:
✓ Restitution - Nothing matters more than paying victims back ✓ Genuine Remorse - Demonstrated through actions, not words ✓ Accepting Responsibility - Without minimizing or excusing ✓ High-Quality Character Evidence - From credible sources ✓ Demonstrated Transformation - Extraordinary, not ordinary ✓ Strategic Allocution - Humanizing without seeming entitled ✓ Strong Reentry Plan - Realistic post-release future
What Doesn't Work:
✗ Claiming sophistication or success as mitigation ✗ Minimizing victim harm ✗ Appearing entitled or above the law ✗ Generic character letters ✗ Blaming circumstances or others ✗ Emphasizing stress or financial pressure ✗ Comparing to violent criminals
The Numbers Are Harsh, But Variance Is Possible:
Even with guidelines of 78-97 months, judges routinely grant 30-50% variances in white collar cases with compelling mitigation. The key is:
Starting early (12-18 months before sentencing)
Comprehensive mitigation preparation
Professional presentation
Genuine transformation
Strategic positioning
You Can't Change What You Did. But You Can Control How You Present Yourself.
With 300+ white collar clients achieving an average 75-93% reduction, I've seen what works. The defendants who achieve the best outcomes share common traits:
They accept responsibility completely
They make maximum restitution efforts
They demonstrate genuine transformation
They present compelling mitigation strategically
They work with experienced consultants who understand white collar sentencing
Your professional life may be over. Your freedom doesn't have to be.
About the Author
Joseph De Gregorio served 24 years on Wall Street before his own federal white-collar case. Facing 41-51 months in federal prison, he achieved a 75% reduction to 12 months and a day through strategic sentencing mitigation. Then structured his early release and served only 25% of his time. Since his release, he has helped more than 400 white-collar defendants navigate federal sentencing, with clients achieving sentence reductions up to 93%.
Featured in: Bloomberg Law, American Bar Association's JustPod podcast, Business Insider
Services: White collar sentencing mitigation, restitution strategy, PSI preparation, comprehensive sentencing planning
Contact: For confidential consultation about your white collar case, visit https://app.reclaim.ai/m/joseph--jnadvisor/high-priority-meeting [646-588-8182].
